Moondrop starfield frequency response
![moondrop starfield frequency response moondrop starfield frequency response](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0287/6666/6849/files/graph_3_517caad2-9e39-45c9-a308-3a42dd0af122_1600x1600.png)
![moondrop starfield frequency response moondrop starfield frequency response](https://everydaylisteningblog.files.wordpress.com/2021/04/moondrop-aria.png)
If not for the graphs, one can also take this database as a list of headphones I’ve tried and auditioned, and the graphs simply being proof of it.ĥ. 99% of the headphones I’ve measured, I have listened to as well. I get that certain people like to paint me as some sort of objectivehead figure where all I do is look at graphs and determine quality sorely off of said metrics. Measurements are meant to complement subjective impressions, not form the basis for them. For additional target curves, the Graph Comparison Tool has them available.Ĥ. All headphone measurements are compensated to the “IEF Neutral” target curve by default. Flat on the graph DOES NOT MEAN flat in real life. The fact that headphones bypass the head necessitates higher SPL in the 2-5k regions as compensation (see: Diffuse Field, Head Related Transfer Function, Harman Target).ģ.1. This means that measurements in this database are directly compatible with target curves like KEMAR Diffuse-Field and the Harman Target, both of which are derived from GRAS rigs.ģ. Measurements in this database are done on a GRAS 43AG-7 and so conform to the standards laid out in IEC60318-7. It’s not going to tell you if it’s good ice cream, but at least you have a way of finding out if it’s the flavour you want.Ģ. The FR is like the branding at the side of the tub telling you the flavour of the ice cream. A Frequency Response graph is not in any way an indication of good sound quality. Think of it as flavours, like in ice-cream.